Friday, August 31, 2012

Ryan goes on the attack, injects enthusiasm into huge RNC crowd ...

Paul Ryan officially claimed his job as Mitt Romney?s running mate at the Republican National Convention Wednesday night.

His speech brought the thousands in attendance to their feet numerous times as he went on the attack and made the case to America for the Romney team to be voted into the White House.

Democrats and other critics said many of the things he said were flat out lies. The facts will be dissected in the days to come.

Here is the full text of Ryan?s speech:

Mr. Chairman, delegates, and fellow citizens: I am honored by the support of this convention for vice president of the United States.

I accept the duty to help lead our nation out of a jobs crisis and back to prosperity ? and I know we can do this.

I accept the calling of my generation to give our children the America that was given to us, with opportunity for the young and security for the old ? and I know that we are ready.?

Our nominee is sure ready. His whole life has prepared him for this moment ? to meet serious challenges in a serious way, without excuses and idle words.? After four years of getting the run-around, America needs a turnaround, and the man for the job is Governor Mitt Romney.

I?m the newcomer to the campaign, so let me share a first impression.? I have never seen opponents so silent about their record, and so desperate to keep their power.?

They?ve run out of ideas.? Their moment came and went. Fear and division are all they?ve got left.???

With all their attack ads, the president is just throwing away money ? and he?s pretty experienced at that.? You see, some people can?t be dragged down by the usual cheap tactics, because their ability, character, and plain decency are so obvious ? and ladies and gentlemen, that is Mitt Romney.??

For my part, your nomination is an unexpected turn.? It certainly came as news to my family, and I?d like you to meet them: My wife Janna, our daughter Liza, and our boys Charlie and Sam.?

The kids are happy to see their grandma, who lives in Florida.? There she is ? my Mom, Betty.?

My Dad, a small-town lawyer, was also named Paul.? Until we lost him when I was 16, he was a gentle presence in my life.? I like to think he?d be proud of me and my sister and brothers, because I?m sure proud of him and of where I come from, Janesville, Wisconsin.???

I live on the same block where I grew up.? We belong to the same parish where I was baptized.? Janesville is that kind of place.

The people of Wisconsin have been good to me.? I?ve tried to live up to their trust.? And now I ask those hardworking men and women, and millions like them across America, to join our cause and get this country working again.

When Governor Romney asked me to join the ticket, I said, ?Let?s get this done? ? and that is exactly, what we?re going to do.?

President Barack Obama came to office during an economic crisis, as he has reminded us a time or two.? Those were very tough days, and any fair measure of his record has to take that into account.? My home state voted for President Obama. When he talked about change, many people liked the sound of it, especially in Janesville, where we were about to lose a major factory.?

A lot of guys I went to high school with worked at that GM plant. Right there at that plant, candidate Obama said: ?I believe that if our government is there to support you ? this plant will be here for another hundred years.?? That?s what he said in 2008.

Well, as it turned out, that plant didn?t last another year.? It is locked up and empty to this day.? And that?s how it is in so many towns today, where the recovery that was promised is nowhere in sight.?

Right now, 23 million men and women are struggling to find work.? Twenty-three million people, unemployed or underemployed.? Nearly one in six Americans is living in poverty.? Millions of young Americans have graduated from college during the Obama presidency, ready to use their gifts and get moving in life.? Half of them can?t find the work they studied for, or any work at all.?

So here?s the question: Without a change in leadership, why would the next four years be any different from the last four years?

The first troubling sign came with the stimulus.? It was President Obama?s first and best shot at fixing the economy, at a time when he got everything he wanted under one-party rule.? It cost $831 billion ? the largest one-time expenditure ever by our federal government.

It went to companies like Solyndra, with their gold-plated connections, subsidized jobs, and make-believe markets. The stimulus was a case of political patronage, corporate welfare, and cronyism at their worst. You, the working men and women of this country, were cut out of the deal.??

What did the taxpayers get out of the Obama stimulus?? More debt.? That money wasn?t just spent and wasted ? it was borrowed, spent, and wasted.??

Maybe the greatest waste of all was time. Here we were, faced with a massive job crisis ? so deep that if everyone out of work stood in single file, that unemployment line would stretch the length of the entire American continent.? You would think that any president, whatever his party, would make job creation, and nothing else, his first order of economic business.??

But this president didn?t do that.? Instead, we got a long, divisive, all-or-nothing attempt to put the federal government in charge of health care.?

Obamacare comes to more than two thousand pages of rules, mandates, taxes, fees, and fines that have no place in a free country.???????????????????????????????????????

The president has declared that the debate over government-controlled health care is over.? That will come as news to the millions of Americans who will elect Mitt Romney so we can repeal Obamacare.

And the biggest, coldest power play of all in Obamacare came at the expense of the elderly.?

You see, even with all the hidden taxes to pay for the health care takeover, even with new taxes on nearly a million small businesses, the planners in Washington still didn?t have enough money.? They needed more.? They needed hundreds of billions more.? So, they just took it all away from Medicare.? Seven hundred and sixteen billion dollars, funneled out of Medicare by President Obama.? An obligation we have to our parents and grandparents is being sacrificed, all to pay for a new entitlement we didn?t even ask for.? The greatest threat to Medicare is Obamacare, and we?re going to stop it.?

In Congress, when they take out the heavy books and wall charts about Medicare, my thoughts go back to a house on Garfield Street in Janesville.? My wonderful grandma, Janet, had Alzheimer?s and moved in with Mom and me.? Though she felt lost at times, we did all the little things that made her feel loved.?

We had help from Medicare, and it was there, just like it?s there for my Mom today.? Medicare is a promise, and we will honor it.? A Romney-Ryan administration will protect and strengthen Medicare, for my Mom?s generation, for my generation, and for my kids and yours.?

So our opponents can consider themselves on notice.? In this election, on this issue, the usual posturing on the Left isn?t going to work.? Mitt Romney and I know the difference between protecting a program, and raiding it.? Ladies and gentlemen, our nation needs this debate.? We want this debate.? We will win this debate.???

Obamacare, as much as anything else, explains why a presidency that began with such anticipation now comes to such a disappointing close.?

It began with a financial crisis; it ends with a job crisis.?

It began with a housing crisis they alone didn?t cause; it ends with a housing crisis they didn?t correct.?

It began with a perfect Triple-A credit rating for the United States; it ends with a downgraded America.?

It all started off with stirring speeches, Greek columns, the thrill of something new.? Now all that?s left is a presidency adrift, surviving on slogans that already seem tired, grasping at a moment that has already passed, like a ship trying to sail on yesterday?s wind.?

President Obama was asked not long ago to reflect on any mistakes he might have made.? He said, well, ?I haven?t communicated enough.?? He said his job is to ?tell a story to the American people? ? as if that?s the whole problem here? He needs to talk more, and we need to be better listeners?

Ladies and gentlemen, these past four years we have suffered no shortage of words in the White House.? What?s missing is leadership in the White House.? And the story that Barack Obama does tell, forever shifting blame to the last administration, is getting old.? The man assumed office almost four years ago ? isn?t it about time he assumed responsibility?

In this generation, a defining responsibility of government is to steer our nation clear of a debt crisis while there is still time.? Back in 2008, candidate Obama called a $10 trillion national debt ?unpatriotic? ? serious talk from what looked to be a serious reformer.?

Yet by his own decisions, President Obama has added more debt than any other president before him, and more than all the troubled governments of Europe combined.? One president, one term, $5 trillion in new debt.

He created a bipartisan debt commission. They came back with an urgent report.? He thanked them, sent them on their way, and then did exactly nothing.

Republicans stepped up with good-faith reforms and solutions equal to the problems.? How did the president respond?? By doing nothing ? nothing except to dodge and demagogue the issue.

So here we are, $16 trillion in debt and still he does nothing.? In Europe, massive debts have put entire governments at risk of collapse, and still he does nothing. And all we have heard from this president and his team are attacks on anyone who dares to point out the obvious.?

They have no answer to this simple reality: We need to stop spending money we don?t have.

My Dad used to say to me: ?Son.? You have a choice: You can be part of the problem, or you can be part of the solution.?? The present administration has made its choices.? And Mitt Romney and I have made ours: Before the math and the momentum overwhelm us all, we are going to solve this nation?s economic problems.?

And I?m going to level with you: We don?t have that much time.? But if we are serious, and smart, and we lead, we can do this.

After four years of government trying to divide up the wealth, we will get America creating wealth again. With tax fairness and regulatory reform, we?ll put government back on the side of the men and women who create jobs, and the men and women who need jobs.?

My Mom started a small business, and I?ve seen what it takes. Mom was 50 when my Dad died.? She got on a bus every weekday for years, and rode 40 miles each morning to Madison.? She earned a new degree and learned new skills to start her small business.? It wasn?t just a new livelihood.? It was a new life.? And it transformed my Mom from a widow in grief to a small businesswoman whose happiness wasn?t just in the past.? Her work gave her hope.? It made our family proud.? And to this day, my Mom is my role model.

Behind every small business, there?s a story worth knowing.? All the corner shops in our towns and cities, the restaurants, cleaners, gyms, hair salons, hardware stores ? these didn?t come out of nowhere.? A lot of heart goes into each one.? And if small businesspeople say they made it on their own, all they are saying is that nobody else worked seven days a week in their place.? Nobody showed up in their place to open the door at five in the morning.? Nobody did their thinking, and worrying, and sweating for them.? After all that work, and in a bad economy, it sure doesn?t help to hear from their president that government gets the credit.? What they deserve to hear is the truth: Yes, you did build that.??

We have a plan for a stronger middle class, with the goal of generating 12 million new jobs over the next four years.

In a clean break from the Obama years, and frankly from the years before this president, we will keep federal spending at 20 percent of GDP, or less.? That is enough.? The choice is whether to put hard limits on economic growth, or hard limits on the size of government, and we choose to limit government.?

I learned a good deal about economics, and about America, from the author of the Reagan tax reforms ? the great Jack Kemp.? What gave Jack that incredible enthusiasm was his belief in the possibilities of free people, in the power of free enterprise and strong communities to overcome poverty and despair.?? We need that same optimism right now.?

And in our dealings with other nations, a Romney-Ryan administration will speak with confidence and clarity.? Wherever men and women rise up for their own freedom, they will know that the American president is on their side.? Instead of managing American decline, leaving allies to doubt us and adversaries to test us, we will act in the conviction that the United States is still the greatest force for peace and liberty that this world has ever known.

President Obama is the kind of politician who puts promises on the record, and then calls that the record.? But we are four years into this presidency. The issue is not the economy as Barack Obama inherited it, not the economy as he envisions it, but this economy as we are living it.?

College graduates should not have to live out their 20s in their childhood bedrooms, staring up at fading Obama posters and wondering when they can move out and get going with life.? Everyone who feels stuck in the Obama economy is right to focus on the here and now.? And I hope you understand this too, if you?re feeling left out or passed by: You have not failed, your leaders have failed you.

None of us have to settle for the best this administration offers ? a dull, adventureless journey from one entitlement to the next, a government-planned life, a country where everything is free but us.?

Listen to the way we?re spoken to already, as if everyone is stuck in some class or station in life, victims of circumstances beyond our control, with government there to help us cope with our fate.?

It?s the exact opposite of everything I learned growing up in Wisconsin, or at college in Ohio.? When I was waiting tables, washing dishes, or mowing lawns for money, I never thought of myself as stuck in some station in life.? I was on my own path, my own journey, an American journey where I could think for myself, decide for myself, define happiness for myself.? That?s what we do in this country.? That?s the American Dream.? That?s freedom, and I?ll take it any day over the supervision and sanctimony of the central planners.?

By themselves, the failures of one administration are not a mandate for a new administration.? A challenger must stand on his own merits.? He must be ready and worthy to serve in the office of president.?

We?re a full generation apart, Governor Romney and I.? And, in some ways, we?re a little different.? There are the songs on his iPod, which I?ve heard on the campaign bus and on many hotel elevators. He actually urged me to play some of these songs at campaign rallies.? I said, I hope it?s not a deal-breaker Mitt, but my playlist starts with AC/DC, and ends with Zeppelin.

A generation apart. That makes us different, but not in any of the things that matter.? Mitt Romney and I both grew up in the heartland, and we know what places like Wisconsin and Michigan look like when times are good, when people are working, when families are doing more than just getting by.? And we both know it can be that way again.?

We?ve had very different careers ? mine mainly in public service, his mostly in the private sector. He helped start businesses and turn around failing ones. By the way, being successful in business ? that?s a good thing.

Mitt has not only succeeded, but succeeded where others could not. ?He turned around the Olympics at a time when a great institution was collapsing under the weight of bad management, overspending, and corruption ? sounds familiar, doesn?t it??

He was the Republican governor of a state where almost nine in ten legislators are Democrats, and yet he balanced the budget without raising taxes. Unemployment went down, household incomes went up, and Massachusetts, under Mitt Romney, saw its credit rating upgraded.

Mitt and I also go to different churches.? But in any church, the best kind of preaching is done by example.? And I?ve been watching that example.? The man who will accept your nomination tomorrow is prayerful and faithful and honorable. Not only a defender of marriage, he offers an example of marriage at its best. Not only a fine businessman, he?s a fine man, worthy of leading this optimistic and good-hearted country.?

?Our different faiths come together in the same moral creed.? We believe that in every life there is goodness; for every person, there is hope.? Each one of us was made for a reason, bearing the image and likeness of the Lord of Life.?

We have responsibilities, one to another ? we do not each face the world alone.? And the greatest of all responsibilities, is that of the strong to protect the weak.? The truest measure of any society is how it treats those who cannot defend or care for themselves.

Each of these great moral ideas is essential to democratic government ? to the rule of law, to life in a humane and decent society.? They are the moral creed of our country, as powerful in our time, as on the day of America?s founding.? They are self-evident and unchanging, and sometimes, even presidents need reminding, that our rights come from nature and God, not from government.?

The founding generation secured those rights for us, and in every generation since, the best among us have defended our freedoms.? They are protecting us right now.? We honor them and all our veterans, and we thank them.

The right that makes all the difference now, is the right to choose our own leaders.? And you are entitled to the clearest possible choice, because the time for choosing is drawing near.? So here is our pledge.

We will not duck the tough issues, we will lead.?

We will not spend four years blaming others, we will take responsibility.?

We will not try to replace our founding principles, we will reapply our founding principles.

The work ahead will be hard.? These times demand the best of us ? all of us, but we can do this.? Together, we can do this.

We can get this country working again.? We can get this economy growing again.? We can make the safety net safe again.? We can do this.?

Whatever your political party, let?s come together for the sake of our country.? Join Mitt Romney and me.? Let?s give this effort everything we have.? Let?s see this through all the way.? Let?s get this done.?

Thank you, and God bless.

?

Source: http://kdvr.com/2012/08/29/ryan-goes-on-the-attack-injects-enthusiasm-into-huge-rnc-crowd/

jane goodall saturday night fever glamping forgetting sarah marshall taraji p. henson irs shuttle discovery

Thursday, August 30, 2012

New images show off possible HTC tablet

HTC tablet

HTC has been rather quiet on the tablet front but some new images leaked on Twitter by @evleaks have given us something interesting to look at. At this point, there is pretty much nothing to go on in terms of information about the device, not even the exact OS it may be running but the images sure are pretty to look at if nothing else.

In my opinion, it looks styled after the HTC One series though, I'd be lying if I didn't also say it looks like a decapitated iMac. That's it, enjoy the images for now and by all means, feel free to speculate in the comments. You'll find some more shots below for your drooling pleasure and here's to hoping we see more when IFA 2012 kicks off fully.

Source: Twitter

read more



Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/4ZseyCvwnDw/story01.htm

casey anthony video recess appointment eastman kodak eastman kodak richard cordray shannon de lima joe torre

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Crop Science Society of America announces 2012 award recipients

Crop Science Society of America announces 2012 award recipients [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 29-Aug-2012
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Sara Uttech
suttech@agronomy.org
608-268-4948
American Society of Agronomy

Awards will be presented at the Annual Meetings in Cincinnati in October

MADISON, WI - Aug. 29, 2012 The Crop Science Society of America (CSSA) announces the following 2012 awards that will be formally presented during their Annual Meetings, Oct. 21-24, 2012 in Cincinnati, OH.

Kenneth G. Cassman, University of Nebraska-Lincoln - CSSA Presidential Award: Ken Cassman is the Robert B. Daughertry Professor of Agronomy at the University of Nebraska, and Chair of the CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council. He received a B.S. degree from the University of California-San Diego, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Hawaii.

Bill Cox, Cornell University - Crop Science Extension Education Award: Bill Cox, Professor and Agronomist in the Crop and Soil Sciences Dep. at Cornell University, conducts the NY corn silage hybrid and soybean variety tests. He received a B.A. from Holy Cross, M.S. from Fresno State University, and Ph.D. from Oregon State University.

Ravi P. Singh, CIMMYT - Crop Science Research Award: Ravi Singh is Distinguished Scientist and Head of Bread Wheat Improvement at International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center in Mexico. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees from Banaras Hindu University, India, and a Ph.D. degree from the University of Sydney.

Charles A. [Chuck] Francis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln - Crop Science Teaching Award: Charles Francis is Professor of Agronomy and Horticulture, University ofNebraska Lincoln. He received a B.S. from University of California-Davis, M.S. and Ph.D. from Cornell University, and D.Sc. [Hons causas] from Helsinki University.

Darrell L. Hanavan, Colorado State University - CSSA Honorary Membership: Darrell L. Hanavan is Executive Director of the Colorado Wheat Administrative Committee, Colorado Association of Wheat Growers and Colorado Wheat Research Foundation. He received his B.A. from the UNCO and his M.A. from the University of Denver.

David Spooner, University of Wisconsin-Madison - Frank N. Meyer Medal for Plant Genetic Resources: David Spooner is a Research Botanist in the USDA Agricultural Research Service, with an appointment as Professor in the Horticulture Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He received a Ph.D. degree from Ohio State University.

Leah A. Brilman, Seed Research of Oregon - Fred V. Grau Turfgrass Science Award: Leah Brilman is the Director of Research and Technical Services for Pickseed and Seed Research of Oregon . She received a B.S. degree from California State University Bakersfield, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from University of Arizona.

C L Laxmipathi Gowda, ICRISAT - International Service in Crop Science Award: C L Laxmipathi Gowda is Director of Grain Legumes Program at ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India. He received B.Sc (Ag.) from University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, and Ph.D. from Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhi, India.

Gregory E. Welbaum, Virginia Tech - Seed Science Award: Gregory E. Welbaum is a Professor and Plant Biologist in the Department of Horticulture at Virginia Tech where he teaches and conducts research. He received his BS from Ohio State University and M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of California, Davis.

Twain Butler, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation - Young Crop Scientist Award: Twain Butler is an Associate Professor and Research Agronomist in the Forage Improvement Division at the Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation. He received B.S. degree from Texas Tech University, M.S. degree from Oklahoma State University, and Ph.D. degree from Texas A&M University.

###

For more information on the 2012 CSSA awards, visit: www.crops.org/awards/award. For more information on the 2012 Annual Meetings, visit: www.acsmeetings.org.

Photos of the recipients receiving their awards will be posted online following the Annual Meetings and placed on our Newsroom page: www.acsmeetings.org/newsroom/news-releases

The Crop Science Society of America (CSSA), founded in 1955, is an international scientific society comprised of 6,000+ members with its headquarters in Madison, WI. Members advance the discipline of crop science by acquiring and disseminating information about crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology; crop ecology, management, and quality; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazinglands; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; and biomedical and enhanced plants.

CSSA fosters the transfer of knowledge through an array of programs and services, including publications, meetings, career services, and science policy initiatives. For more information, visit www.crops.org



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Crop Science Society of America announces 2012 award recipients [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 29-Aug-2012
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Sara Uttech
suttech@agronomy.org
608-268-4948
American Society of Agronomy

Awards will be presented at the Annual Meetings in Cincinnati in October

MADISON, WI - Aug. 29, 2012 The Crop Science Society of America (CSSA) announces the following 2012 awards that will be formally presented during their Annual Meetings, Oct. 21-24, 2012 in Cincinnati, OH.

Kenneth G. Cassman, University of Nebraska-Lincoln - CSSA Presidential Award: Ken Cassman is the Robert B. Daughertry Professor of Agronomy at the University of Nebraska, and Chair of the CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council. He received a B.S. degree from the University of California-San Diego, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Hawaii.

Bill Cox, Cornell University - Crop Science Extension Education Award: Bill Cox, Professor and Agronomist in the Crop and Soil Sciences Dep. at Cornell University, conducts the NY corn silage hybrid and soybean variety tests. He received a B.A. from Holy Cross, M.S. from Fresno State University, and Ph.D. from Oregon State University.

Ravi P. Singh, CIMMYT - Crop Science Research Award: Ravi Singh is Distinguished Scientist and Head of Bread Wheat Improvement at International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center in Mexico. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees from Banaras Hindu University, India, and a Ph.D. degree from the University of Sydney.

Charles A. [Chuck] Francis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln - Crop Science Teaching Award: Charles Francis is Professor of Agronomy and Horticulture, University ofNebraska Lincoln. He received a B.S. from University of California-Davis, M.S. and Ph.D. from Cornell University, and D.Sc. [Hons causas] from Helsinki University.

Darrell L. Hanavan, Colorado State University - CSSA Honorary Membership: Darrell L. Hanavan is Executive Director of the Colorado Wheat Administrative Committee, Colorado Association of Wheat Growers and Colorado Wheat Research Foundation. He received his B.A. from the UNCO and his M.A. from the University of Denver.

David Spooner, University of Wisconsin-Madison - Frank N. Meyer Medal for Plant Genetic Resources: David Spooner is a Research Botanist in the USDA Agricultural Research Service, with an appointment as Professor in the Horticulture Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He received a Ph.D. degree from Ohio State University.

Leah A. Brilman, Seed Research of Oregon - Fred V. Grau Turfgrass Science Award: Leah Brilman is the Director of Research and Technical Services for Pickseed and Seed Research of Oregon . She received a B.S. degree from California State University Bakersfield, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from University of Arizona.

C L Laxmipathi Gowda, ICRISAT - International Service in Crop Science Award: C L Laxmipathi Gowda is Director of Grain Legumes Program at ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India. He received B.Sc (Ag.) from University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, and Ph.D. from Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhi, India.

Gregory E. Welbaum, Virginia Tech - Seed Science Award: Gregory E. Welbaum is a Professor and Plant Biologist in the Department of Horticulture at Virginia Tech where he teaches and conducts research. He received his BS from Ohio State University and M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of California, Davis.

Twain Butler, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation - Young Crop Scientist Award: Twain Butler is an Associate Professor and Research Agronomist in the Forage Improvement Division at the Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation. He received B.S. degree from Texas Tech University, M.S. degree from Oklahoma State University, and Ph.D. degree from Texas A&M University.

###

For more information on the 2012 CSSA awards, visit: www.crops.org/awards/award. For more information on the 2012 Annual Meetings, visit: www.acsmeetings.org.

Photos of the recipients receiving their awards will be posted online following the Annual Meetings and placed on our Newsroom page: www.acsmeetings.org/newsroom/news-releases

The Crop Science Society of America (CSSA), founded in 1955, is an international scientific society comprised of 6,000+ members with its headquarters in Madison, WI. Members advance the discipline of crop science by acquiring and disseminating information about crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology; crop ecology, management, and quality; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazinglands; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; and biomedical and enhanced plants.

CSSA fosters the transfer of knowledge through an array of programs and services, including publications, meetings, career services, and science policy initiatives. For more information, visit www.crops.org



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-08/asoa-css082912.php

instagram for android dallas news dallas fort worth dfw 1930 census nike new nfl uniforms nfl uniforms

The ideological chasm behind the personal narratives of Obama and Romney (Powerlineblog)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/244097013?client_source=feed&format=rss

correspondents dinner i am legend san antonio spurs greta van susteren tony parker the five year engagement chris kreider

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Disney and FOSS: Fun and FUD in the Magic Kingdom?

They say it's a small world after all, but in the Magic Kingdom, it appears to be a FUD-filled world as well. How else to explain a recent episode of "Shake It Up" on the Disney Channel? Asked to diagnose a misbehaving PC, a stereotypically geeky character asks, "Did you use open source code to save time and the virus was hidden in it?" Much canned laughter ensued, of course -- as did widespread outrage.


Source: http://ectnews.com.feedsportal.com/c/34520/f/632000/s/22c73d83/l/0L0Stechnewsworld0N0Crsstory0C760A0A80Bhtml/story01.htm

ellen degeneres jcpenney yeardley love nba all star reserves rock center christine christine will ferrell

Panda preferences influence trees used for scent marking

Panda preferences influence trees used for scent marking [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 27-Aug-2012
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Christina Simmons
csimmons@sandiegozoo.org
619-685-3291
Zoological Society of San Diego

As solitary animals, giant pandas have developed a number of ways to communicate those times when they are ready to come into close contact. One means of this communication occurs through scent marking. A recent study by San Diego Zoo Global researchers, collaborating with researchers at the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Science, indicates that pandas make clear and specific choices about what trees are used for scent marking.

"Variables affecting the selection of scent-marking sites included bark roughnesss, presence of moss on the tree trunk, tree diameter and distance to the trail," said Ron Swaisgood, Ph.D., co-head of San Diego Zoo Global's Giant Panda Conservation Unit. "These choices have clear effects on the scent signal, making it last longer, be detected from further away, or otherwise enhance its communication efficiency. We are not surprised that pandas are efficient with their use of chemo-signals, as mounting evidence suggests that many aspects of giant panda life history are constrained by their energetically poor diet."

This study, which was recently published in "Animal Behavior," confirms that old-growth forest and other factors like tree type are important for maintaining habitat that will support giant panda conservation.

###

The San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research is dedicated to generating, sharing and applying scientific knowledge vital to the conservation of animals, plants and habitats worldwide. The work of the Institute includes onsite research efforts at the San Diego Zoo and the San Diego Zoo Safari Park (historically referred to as Wild Animal Park), laboratory work at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center for Conservation Research, and international field programs involving more than 235 researchers working in 35 countries. In addition to the Beckman Center for Conservation Research, the Institute also operates the Anne and Kenneth Griffin Reptile Conservation Center, the Frozen Zoo and Native Seed Gene Bank, the Keauhou and Maui Hawaiian Bird Conservation Centers, Cocha Cashu Biological Research Station and the Desert Tortoise Conservation Center.

The Zoo also manages the 1,800-acre San Diego Zoo Safari Park, which includes a 900-acre biodiversity reserve, and the San Diego Zoo. The important conservation and science work of these entities is supported in part by The Foundation of the Zoological Society of San Diego.



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Panda preferences influence trees used for scent marking [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 27-Aug-2012
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Christina Simmons
csimmons@sandiegozoo.org
619-685-3291
Zoological Society of San Diego

As solitary animals, giant pandas have developed a number of ways to communicate those times when they are ready to come into close contact. One means of this communication occurs through scent marking. A recent study by San Diego Zoo Global researchers, collaborating with researchers at the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Science, indicates that pandas make clear and specific choices about what trees are used for scent marking.

"Variables affecting the selection of scent-marking sites included bark roughnesss, presence of moss on the tree trunk, tree diameter and distance to the trail," said Ron Swaisgood, Ph.D., co-head of San Diego Zoo Global's Giant Panda Conservation Unit. "These choices have clear effects on the scent signal, making it last longer, be detected from further away, or otherwise enhance its communication efficiency. We are not surprised that pandas are efficient with their use of chemo-signals, as mounting evidence suggests that many aspects of giant panda life history are constrained by their energetically poor diet."

This study, which was recently published in "Animal Behavior," confirms that old-growth forest and other factors like tree type are important for maintaining habitat that will support giant panda conservation.

###

The San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research is dedicated to generating, sharing and applying scientific knowledge vital to the conservation of animals, plants and habitats worldwide. The work of the Institute includes onsite research efforts at the San Diego Zoo and the San Diego Zoo Safari Park (historically referred to as Wild Animal Park), laboratory work at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center for Conservation Research, and international field programs involving more than 235 researchers working in 35 countries. In addition to the Beckman Center for Conservation Research, the Institute also operates the Anne and Kenneth Griffin Reptile Conservation Center, the Frozen Zoo and Native Seed Gene Bank, the Keauhou and Maui Hawaiian Bird Conservation Centers, Cocha Cashu Biological Research Station and the Desert Tortoise Conservation Center.

The Zoo also manages the 1,800-acre San Diego Zoo Safari Park, which includes a 900-acre biodiversity reserve, and the San Diego Zoo. The important conservation and science work of these entities is supported in part by The Foundation of the Zoological Society of San Diego.



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-08/zsos-ppi082712.php

crossbow airhead atherosclerosis steven tyler tropic thunder carnie wilson missing

Monday, August 27, 2012

1: Liberal arts & technical writing - John Jones's Courses

Rutter writes that ?a project manager at a large electronics firm told me?that writers, to succeed at his company, have to do more than just write fluently. Technical writing, he said, is one-third writing proficiency, one-third problem-solving skill, and one-third ability to work with other people? (21). I do not consider myself a technical writer, and would be intimidated to find myself in a position where I had to apply for jobs in the industry, but I agree with this project manager?s conclusion. Being a good writer is not just being fluent in writing; a good writer is proficient, critical and intelligent, and personable. My understanding is that technical writers have become the liaisons between those split in the dichotomy laid out by Connors. According to Connors there were the engineering folk and the English folk, and I?ve come to define technical writers as those who speak ?engineerese? and ?English? and can get along with, clearly communicate with, and translate for both sides. I argue that, in many ways, technical writers are Renaissance people?they have to excel in many areas in order to succeed in their field.

This raises a point of personal interest for me, an opinion I?ve become more and more vested in with each course I?ve taken in WVU?s PWE master?s program. I attended a small, private liberal arts university for my undergraduate degree. There, I was required to dabble in a variety of departments while still declaring a major with an area of emphasis. I declared English with an emphasis in Fiction Writing and for four years took close to a 50/50 load of courses: English with psychology, sociology, art, math, and natural science, to name a few. And when I graduated with that English degree in hand, I had no intentions of being a teacher (skills for which I?d never been trained) or a novelist (skills for which I, arguably, again had never been trained, despite my emphasis in fiction). I wanted to travel, become a photographer, and write for a lifestyle and travel magazine?all skills for which I had experienced no training in my time at this self-touted, diversity-focused, expensive liberal arts university. I realized only after the fact?in my first job at a PR firm and now six years later in my master?s program?that I had few practical skills. And despite current opinions, like Rutter?s and his project manager friend, that a technical writer must be someone who can write well, think critically and problem solve, and play well with others (a sort of well-roundedness one arguably picks up at a liberal arts institution), I find myself reacting to these sentiments with a cry for more practicality! Where are the business letter writing courses of yore? I feel the need for a ?complete reaction? against the overly-humanistic training so many college students receive today (Connors 7). Did I choose poorly in attending a liberal arts school? Should I have, instead, looked toward vocational schools or programs, or were public and state universities offering something my small, private university wasn?t?

I think our institutions of higher education are missing the target on a happy balance between ?bread and butter? practicality and theoretical practicality (61). The way I interpret Miller?s argument is that the bread and butter is what?s going to get things done, these are the skills that will put food on your table (and the skills I feel I missed out on), while the high-sense practicality is what will keep the world turning, it?s the skills I gleaned from my days at undergrad?problem solving, critical thinking, and? . Of course, Connors illustrated it in his history of technical writing and Miller confirms it is still an issue, that technical writing is considered ?practical in the low sense? (62). And as a young college student, and even now, as a young professional, I certainly, personally, don?t consider technical writing the lowest of the low, but rather still have this perception that technical writing, though challenging and important as it seems to be, is dry?dense?uncreative?even soulless (as one friend who worked for a few years as a project manager at an international pharmaceutical company once called technical writing). And that dryness, more than unfamiliarity of the skill/practice, is what I find most intimidating about technical writing.

I don?t know exactly what I?m postulating here (probably the impossible?a technical writing department within all English departments). I understand that I would have had to have chosen Technical Writing as my field of study if that?s what I wanted to do when I grow up. But it?s not what I want to do when I grow up. I?m still holding tight to that traveler/photographer/writer shtick. But what I?m wondering is: why has technical writing not been more a part of my training? Is there a genre of technical writing relevant to lifestyle-magazine writers? If I?m not writing manuals and don?t have a need to write reports, why do I still feel the need for more practical training? And practical training in what? I used to get asked all the time, when people found out I was an English major, what I wanted to do with my degree: teach? No. Write a book? No. Then, what? And it?s a good question, I think. Technical writers can go anywhere, it seems (I still know very little of the industry?technical, professional, or otherwise), and write manuals or work for technology or pharmaceutical or science or medical companies. Right? But what do I do with my ability to make up stories? I feel like I?ve converted, like I?ve betrayed those from whence I came, but fiction writing? I wonder if it?s not more the low sense of practical. (Creative nonfiction?i.e. lifestyle magazine writing?could be placed in that same category as far as its contribution to our world?s better good or its usefulness is concerned.)

Miller says: ?We seem, that is, uncertain about where to locate norms, about whether the definition of ?good writing? is to be derived from academic knowledge or from nonacademic practices? (62).? I gained some of that academic knowledge in college and have spent many years making up for what sometimes feels like four years of lost time honing my nonacademic practices, and I can?t help but wonder about whether a solid foundation of good writing was laid at my undergrad university, or if I became a better writer because someone took a chance and gave me a (nonacademic) job?

WORKS CITED

Connors, Robert J. ?The Rise of Technical Writing Instruction in America.? Central Works in Technical Communication. Eds. Johndan Johnson-Eilola and Stuart A. Selber. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. 3-19. Print.

Miller, Carolyn R. ?What?s Practical About Technical Writing?? Professional Writing and Rhetoric: Readings from the Field. Ed. Tim Peeples. New York: Addison Wesley Educational Publishers, 2003. 61-70. Print.

Rutter, Russell. ?History, Rhetoric, and Humanism: Toward a More Comprehensive Definition of Technical Communication.? Central Works in Technical Communication. Eds. Johndan Johnson-Eilola and Stuart A. Selber. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. 20-34. Print.

Source: http://courses.johnmjones.org/ENGL605/2012/08/26/1-liberal-arts-and-technical-writing/

wrestlemania country music awards 2012 wrestlemania 28 results earl scruggs game of thrones game of thrones season 2 wrestlemania 28